Major rules changes coming to College Football

Gary Cosby Jr. / USA TODAY NETWORK

It’s been a busy offseason for the Grand Poobahs of the game. First, the NCAA let the PAC 12 and Rose Bowl demolish two-year-long expansion talks, leaving everyone pissy about the outcome (except for the P12, who tried to Baghdad Bob the matter; and the SEC, who are doing just fine down with the status quo, TYVM).

And now, nine rules changes have flown through the pertinent committees, and are coming to a campus near you this Fall.

I’ll hit on these briefly.

1. #BarnCheating: The first and most contentious, is the rash of fake injuries that have besieged the game of late. Though, feel free to ask anyone who has watched an Auburn or LSU game in the last decade: It may just now be reaching the national consciousness, but it’s long been a problem at certain programs.

View post on imgur.com

Despite this being so obviously an area of concern that it was targeted by Director of Officiating, Steve Shaw, the NCAA has effectively let a handful of whiners dictate the outcome of games by doing nothing.

Worse than nothing, the new rule does what the NCAA has done a lot of lately, on everything from trans athletes to COVID — pretends to care but punts the matter to the conferences. “Conferences and school will submit a report to the national coordinator of officials, who will provide feedback to the conference. Then conference or school would then levy any additional punishment,” and “any penalties levied would be up to the conference office or school involved.”

So, nothing, in other words, but let’s pretend we did something. That’s the most Gutless Administrator thing ever. Hell, it sounds like the UN. This is the outstanding leadership that Mark Emmert is getting paid three-million dollars a year for, eh?

2. Speaking of #BarnCheating, Auburn’s entire coverage philosophy has been derailed with one simple sentence: “Defensive holding will remain a 10-yard penalty but will always carry an automatic first down.”

That is a big one. Before, there was absolutely no incentive to not hold in long yardage situations: 2nd and 11? Grab some jersey, and hold on to your butts for just one more snap. 3rd and 16? Yank a dude to the ground off the snap, and try again the next play.

It became very common to see some teams holding on practically every downfield target. The thinking being they can’t or won’t call it every time, and if they do, it’s not necessarily an automatic first down. The calculus of the latter changes somewhat now.

And the strategy has really worked, too. Some defensive coordinators are notorious for holding-as-coverage, among them those old school Saban DCs, particularly Will Muschamp and Kevin Steele. In 2014, Auburn was 54th in pass efficiency defense. With Muschamp’s arrival, Auburn shot all the way up to 31st. The next five years under Steele, who ran an even grabbier defense, Auburn finished in the Top 20% of DPE for four of the next five seasons. With Kevin Steele’s departure in 2021, and despite a bevy of returning starters, Auburn fell to 76th in DPE.

#SoundDefense

Get ready for a lot of laundry this year, particularly among the more aggressive teams and teams with younger or inexperienced corners (and, yes, I fully expect Alabama to draw more than its fair share).

Now, if only they would make DPI a spot-foul...one of the few things the Shield gets right.

3. Perhaps Alabama will stop having their knees and careers targeted by inferior opponents.

When I was researching this piece, I came across a very cogent analysis of the new rules governing blocking below the waist. They are exceptionally Byzantine, and change a lot of core plays for the flexbone, including a player going in motion and then blocking below the waist (BBW, heh), after the snap.

It is in-depth, but worth quoting in its entirety, and I want to single out and credit “LegacyZebra” for as good an explanation as you’ll find:

The first major change is that nobody is allowed to block below the waist outside the tackle box. Nobody. Ever. It’s important to note that the tackle box disintegrates when the ball leaves. So even if a player is located where the tackle box was, once the ball leaves the box that player is no longer in the tackle box.

The next change is who can block below the waist from the side. Offensive linemen who are in the tackle box (5 yards laterally from the ball) at the snap can block below the waist in any direction on their “initial charge”. After the initial charge, they can only block below the waist if the block is from the front. Backs who were stationary in the tackle box at the snap may block below the waist within the tackle box, but only if the block is from the front.

Anybody who is outside the tackle box or in motion at the snap is prohibited from blocking below the waist, no matter the location or direction of the block. That means all low blocks by WR or TE will now be a foul.

On the other side of the ball, defensive players may block low in any direction on their initial charge if they are lined up on the line of scrimmage at the snap and within the lateral bounds of the tackle box. Any low block by the defense other than on the initial charge is now illegal.

If some of that was confusing as to what is or isn’t legal, here is a non-exhaustive list of blocks that were legal last year that are no longer legal:

A WR lined up at the numbers blocks low from the front 4 yards beyond the line of scrimmage. This used to be legal because the block is from the front within 5 yards of the line of scrimmage. Now it is illegal because the WR was not in the tackle box at the snap and because the block was outside the tackle box.

A FB lined up in the tackle box leads a sweep play. 8 yards to the right of where the ball was snapped, he kicks out a defender with a block below the waist from the front. This is now illegal because the block occurs outside the tackle box.

Tackle A77 drops into pass protection when sees defender B99 rushing unabated. In order to prevent a sack he dives and blocks B99 below the waist from the side. The QB still has the ball inside the tackle box and A77 has not left the tackle box. This is now a foul because the block was from the side and was not a part of A77’s initial charge.

H-Back A88 is lined up behind the right tackle. He then side shuffles across the formation and is in motion behind the left guard when the ball is snapped. After the snap, A88 goes into the B gap and blocks below the waist from the front against a defensive lineman at the line of scrimmage. This is now a foul because A88 was in motion at the snap. He is not allowed to block low anywhere in any direction.

Safety B22 comes up to play the run. At a point 1 yard behind the line of scrimmage, he takes out the lead blocker with a block below the waist. This used to be legal because the block was within 5 yards of the line of scrimmage. This is now a foul because B22 was not on the line of scrimmage at the snap and the block was not part of the initial charge.

It is over a decade late for some of these guys, to be sure. But plays that injured Isaiah Buggs, nicked up Daron Payne, and cost Dont’a Hightower an entire season would all be illegal now.

4. Targeting Appeal LSU Bro is like “now you give this to us...”, but the NCAA is finally changing its targeting rules. No, not in the silly Athena-from-the-head-of-Zeus interpretation, but at least in its application and lingering effect.

In games that have instant replay, when a targeting foul occurs in the second half, the carryover penalty (of sitting out the first half of that player’s next game) will be eligible for further appeal.

The process will begin with a conference submitting a request to the NCAA national coordinator of officials, who would review video of the play. If it is obvious that a player was incorrectly penalized for targeting, the call would be overturned, and the player would be cleared to play in the first half of the next game.

I think this is imminently fair. In those cases where replay blew it, or a second-half targeting foul was very borderline, the additional tier of appeal seems like a change to mitigate the harshness of the rule as-written, by not further penalizing a player for an entire half of another ball game.

Alabama was a tremendous beneficiary of the harsh second-game effect, following (what we can all admit) was a really bullshitty targeting foul on star LB, Devin White.

As expected, LSU fans took it very well, with their standard grace, and sanguine stoicism.

5. The Pitt Rule. With all the focus on Barn Cheatin’, our compatriots in the ACC had to be feeling left out. Well, worry no longer!

Kenny Pickett’s bush league slide, which had sports writers across the country goobing and soiling themselves over, is no more. Any player which attempts a headfirst “slide” is down at the beginning of the motion — the same rule the NFL has.

And, in the college game, it really is one that ought to have been thought of at the time. Fake slides are wholly incompatible with targeting, which already places an almost-impossible burden on defenders to pull up when they even suspect that a player is giving himself up and is thus now “defenseless.”

Those are the big five that are most likely to have real impact on the field (four, really; the Kenny Pickett thing was a one-off that needed correction). Notable in these changes is what was not addressed by the PROP?

Pace of play, linemen floating 17-yards downfield, DPI, meaningfully curbing fake penalties, better clarified targeting, that ridiculous overtime rule, and so many other meaningful and/or QOL rules to better the game.

There’s always next year! Which, in NCAA-speak, that means we may do something about in 2031.

Comments

Bold call there, Erik@@

Get ready for a lot of laundry this year…… (and, yes, I fully expect Alabama to draw more than its fair share).

As long as Bama gets back to contesting throws

Rather than being in phase while watching receivers haul in passes in windows I’ll be cool with dpi. Just less tentative play: guys were in position plenty of times last year (maybe McToastry and Jobe less so) and seeing them get "handsy" would be a welcome change. RTR!!
Also, Fau, Fut, and Fta&m (jimbo mostly)

As long as our D backs keep facing the receiver and never look back for the ball, the laundry will keep flying regardless of this rule change

Saw a former Georgia DB, 2nd round pick

Turn his head to find the ball.

While he was turning his head, the ball went over him and landed softly in the hands of the receiver. And the DB turning his head cost him half a step, allowing the receiver to waltz the remaining 25 yards to the end zone.

He’d have been far better off playing the receiver’s hands. Even if he gets the NFL DPI (spot foul), the result would have been far preferable.

"Turning your head" looks easy when you can see the ball leave the QBs hand and follow it in flight because you’re watching through a camera at the 50.

Put a camera on a DB, and it’s easier to understand why Saban insists on the technique he teaches.

Disagree

No penalty should be over 15 yards. Seeing NFL teams throwing a stupid low % deep ball just to try and get a 50 yard penalty is infuriating. Sorry not sorry.

I'd much rather see that

because the defender still has to interfere. In college ball where bend don’t break is pretty much universal at this point, grabbing a WR rather than actually attempting to defend the deep ball has become a best practice at Auburn some places.

As long as underthrown balls that the receiver pulls up for and creates the contact with the defender are called DPI, I am very much in favor of the 15 yard cap.

You think it’s bad how defenses are taking advantage of this rule now? Make it a spot foul and see what the passing game becomes.

Also: putting a 50 yard penalty up the discretion of *college* officials

It’s like people have already forgotten we got tagged with the most penalty yards in 20+ years at JH because Bo whined on a podcast. Throw in a spot foul DPI, and I’m confident we never get to OT. Some fAU flop would have gifted them 3 points.

That was definitely on my mind as well.

NFL refs and cornerbacks are way better than their average college counterparts. Any QB can throw the ball near a receiver and let him "adjust" back through the defender to get it.

I mean, Devin White made contact to the facemask

It was targeting. That’s likely one that gets appealed for the next game, though.
#FreeDevinWhite

#YouWantDevinFreedBECAUSEHEWHITE

The fake injury thing is so ridiculously easy to solve

In basketball, if you are too injured to shoot the free-throws, you must check out of the game. This kept a guy from faking injury, getting the best free-throw shooter on the team to come in and shoot, then not check out.

If the game must be stopped for an injured player, that play may not play for some pre-determined length of time. I don’t really care what it is. Next stoppage, rest of the possession, end of the quarter, whatever. Just some sort of exclusion that would hurt the team enough to keep this from happening.

If this isn’t being done, it’s because they don’t want to, not because it is complicated. Also, if player safety is really so important, shouldn’t we force injured players to take some time out of the game to make sure they are ok?

Do you really want Will Anderson sitting out a whole quarter because he got hit in family jewels on the first play?

I still say if your offense is so dependent on tempo that you can be shut down by an injury on the other team, you aren’t the offensive guru you think you are.

I don't care about the effect on the offense as much as it sucks to watch a game being played that way.

I agree that would suck

So maybe a quarter would be too much.

However, I’ve watched too many TRASH Auburn and Tennessee games. 8 stoppages in a drive for injuries, and all of those players came back to play in that same series

I agree, it totally wrecks the pace of play

I’m just not sure what you do about it, without the unintended consequences being worse. Of course the NCAA pays people to figure this stuff out so you’d think they could come up with something.

They do pay people...

but, it certainly isn’t for their problem-solving prowess.

If you’re too injured to shoot the free throws

The opposing team gets to pick your free throw shooter. And they’ll pick your scrub center who shoots 42% from the stripe. That’s the deterrent.

I’d give teams two free injury timeouts per quarter. Or 3 per half. Something based on game averages to date. After that, they cost you 5 yards each. It ain’t perfect, but it addresses the main issue, which is a drive with 3 or 4 "injuries" so a defense can match personnel.

Cramps are the biggest mystery as far as penalty

If anyone whose played any sport or exercise can say, you can be jogging along minding your own business then suddenly you are shot in the hamstring by a shotgun.

yeah idk how they're going to regulate that

Pickle juice

It's like RIDING a PONY

Except that PONY is 30 FEET TALL and covered in CHAINSAWS.

Exactly!

With the proliferation of fast offenses we should expect defenses to be exhausted and cramping late in the game. Defenses are defending a lot more plays than defenses have in the past.

Players are most likely coached to drop if a cramp hits. It’s a bad look but they can’t play so they have to drop in order to stop the game. How else can they get a substitution in? Should a team be forced to call a time-out every time a player gets a cramp? If so, that would put an even greater advantage to the team that has enough depth to substitute more often.

All I know is

Between the NCAA & SEC refs, even these changes will still F up something.

View All Comments
Back to top ↑